|
From: | felix winkelmann |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-hackers] Build problems |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:03:21 +0100 |
On 1/29/07, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit: > (Why isn't /usr/local/lib in the default linker path? And why do some > systems not put /usr/local/bin into the PATH? Why make using the system > harder than it needs to be? Oh, well...) Some distros reject the whole idea of /usr/local, basically. They make no distinction between system packages in /bin or /usr/bin and local packages in /usr/local/bin (and their lib analogues): it's all just packages.
Ok, but since all autotools-based source packages automatically use /usr/local as prefix, distros should at least prepare for that situation and not let the user stand there scratching his/her head. cheers, felix
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |