Re: [Chicken-hackers] anybody good with cmake?

[Brandon Van Every]

On 8/19/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, one could certainly say that. On the other hand, chicken does
> at least the basic stuff right.

So does CMake.

> But the real problem is that of maintenance. I feel I can't maintain
> the CMake build myself. You seem not to be interested in that, unless
> the autotools build is dropped (which, if I may say so, does what it
> should, even in it's mindboggling uglyness). Since I'm not interested
> in that kind of blackmailing,

I'm unimpressed by your lack of vision regarding the build system.
I'm getting a strong feeling of "casting pearls before swine."

> this means that the cmake build is effectively
> abandoned, if no one else can be found (and I'm mighty happy that Peter, who
> already maintains spiffy, is looking into it).

The value of my work will be shown in whether other people pursue it.

I'm unsubscribing from Chicken mailing lists.  I've had enough of
this.  You're on your own.

People with a sincere interest in advancing CMake technologies for the
benefit of the Chicken community are welcome to send me private e-mail
if they need advice.


Good luck,
Brandon Van Every