[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Auth]A comment on terminology
From: |
Albert Scherbinsky |
Subject: |
[Auth]A comment on terminology |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:10:29 -0500 |
The term 'Profile Provider' is misleading. I recommend
'Profile Host' as a replacement. 'Profile Provider' implies
that it is the source of the profile data. But, of course, a
Profile Host only hosts the profile, the owner of the data
'Provides' the data.
The term 'Content Provider' is restrictive. I recommend
'Service Provider' as a replacement. Although a Service
Provider may merely provide content, the interesting ones
also provide other services.
Profile Host: Hosts profiles to facilitate remote
access.
Profile Owner: Owns profile data and controls access to
it.
Service Provider: Creates and delivers Web Services that
request profile data.
This is the terminology that I intend to use.
Regards,
Albert Scherbinsky
Drop by at: http://members.rogers.com/alberts/
Convenient control of our personal information:
Single Login:
http://members.rogers.com/alberts/single.htm
Simple Interface Markup Language:
http://members.rogers.com/alberts/siml.htm
Personal Information Base XML
http://members.rogers.com/alberts/PIB.htm
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), (continued)
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), John, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/01/05
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Mike Warren, 2002/01/09
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/01/09
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/10
- [Auth]A real life case in Identity, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/01/10
- Re: [Auth]A real life case in Identity, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/01/11
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Mike Warren, 2002/01/11
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), David Sugar, 2002/01/06
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/07
- [Auth]A comment on terminology,
Albert Scherbinsky <=
- Re: [Auth]A comment on terminology, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/08
- Re: [Auth]A comment on terminology, Norbert Bollow, 2002/01/08
- Re: [Auth]A comment on terminology, Albert Scherbinsky, 2002/01/08
- Re: [Auth]A comment on terminology, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/08
- Re: [Auth]A comment on terminology, David Sugar, 2002/01/08
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/07
- Re: [Auth]Re: What I percieve is wrong with IDsec (was IDsec specification draft), Hans Zandbelt, 2002/01/07