Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU vs .NET (was Re: flexible for users, or...) User Interfaces)

[David Bradley]

Norbert Bollow wrote:

> DotGNU is _not_ about cloning .NET ... we're planning
> quite a few things that have no counterpart in .NET ...
> and if you look at phpGroupWare you'll see that some
> (relatively small) parts of that kind are already
> available and useable.
That sounds interesting, I'll take a look.

> (a) Make something similar to the good parts of what they
>    create, while improving on it as we go along.
>
> (b) Make good things that don't exist in proprietary
>    software yet.
>
>  
Look forward to seeing more of this. For my limitted exposure to open 
source, it's been more of the other way. The open/free source varient 
was more difficult to use and not as good a quality, especially in 
support tools.