|
From: | David Bradley |
Subject: | Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces) |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:32:25 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1 |
S11001001 wrote:
I'm not sure if I'd say it is "better". Was Windows was better because it was built on top of MSDos. It may be "better" from the view that it's easier and less risky than coming up with something unique.I share a quote from Stroustrup:"C has its problems, but a language designed from scratch would have some too, and we know C's problems."This is why it's better to start with the CLI (stop calling it .NET! .NET is a marketing term. CLI is the system DG supports), find its weak spots, and patch them, than to design something from scratch.
David Bradley (Not the guy on the IBM commercial)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |