Re: master a30781399b3: * subr-x (eval-command-interactive-spec): New function.

[Stefan Monnier]

>> And why is that preferable over `(advice-)eval-interactive-spec`?
>
> You mean, why is it worth factoring out
>
>     (advice-eval-interactive-spec (cadr (interactive-form command)))
>
> ?

Yes.

> Well, it's indeed less worth factoring out now that you've pointed out
> my mistake about interactive-form, but it seems seems worth it to me on
> balance.

AFAICT the functionality of `advice-eval-interactive-spec` is not used
often at all, so having a specialized version for the specific case when
it's applied to (cadr (interactive-form command)) seems hard to justify.

Can you point to (potential) users?


        Stefan