Re: master a30781399b3: * subr-x (eval-command-interactive-spec): New function.

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Wed 14 Jun 2023 at 04:52PM -04, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> OK, so that's one example.  Any other?  Because, to me, a single
> use-case doesn't seem to justify the definition of a one-liner helper
> function.
> [ Especially since that helper function is still not a faithful
>   simulation of what happens in a "normal" execution of the command
>   and fixing that wrinkle will likely require changing the API :-(  ]

Right.  I don't have another example yet, and I don't think I would have
proposed adding this at all had I realised that most of it is already
implemented in `interactive-form'.  If no-one else speaks up in favour
of keeping it, I'll go ahead and remove it again.

-- 
Sean Whitton