[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2
|
From: |
Paul F. Dietz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:05:35 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 |
Vadim V. Zhytnikov wrote:
# GCL is about as robust/correct as CLISP
seems to be misleading a bit. What do you mean
by "robust/correct" ? I know that have random
tester in mind but it is not so clear for casual
user. So maybe something like
GCL certainly is not as *compliant* as CLISP at this point.
# GCL compiler is about as robust/correct as CLISP one
would be better.
And specify that this is under the random tester, since the
random tester does not test all of lisp, just a mostly
integer subset.
Paul
[Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/18
[Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/06/18
[Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/25