[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] CVS guidelines
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] CVS guidelines |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:50:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> "Reverting meaningful patches"? When did these commits take place? Can't you
> checkout the latest version before the badness started occuring, and the
> commit
> them? Or maybe I'm underestimating the number of files which were changed. I
You are. At least half the files (in client/) got re-committed.
> haven't looked through the logs so I don't know.
There are no (meaningful) logs (as in "commit messages").
> And I'm curious, how did the
> patches get "reverterd". Did the user commit without running cvs update
> first?
That would be how they would have gotten reverted. But I do
believe that's the one thing Syan did *not* do :-))
> I having written any code for gnumed yet...just hanging around on the mailing
> list, I hope to get involved eventually...
You are welcome to do so.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CVS guidelines, (continued)