[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR |
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2004 21:05:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> > 1) only if reviewed_by_clinician is false may
> > technically_abnormal be null
> Why this ? Shouldn't technically_abnormal be set
> automatically if range information/status is available from the
> lab data ? What relation has this flag to the clinicians
> decision ?
a) we can't rely on the technically_abnormal information being
there - it needn't be a requirement in other countries
b) we can't rely on the range info being there (if it is and
the technically_abnormal flag is missing we try to
calculate the abnormal flag though)
c) when a clinician reviews the data she IS able to ascertain
whether the value is technically abnormal, so we enforce
that relation, this may be a little tough on the poor
clinician, however
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR, (continued)
[Gnumed-devel] Gnumed early usability? (was: Lab data support in OSCAR), Jim Busser, 2004/05/06
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR, Hilmar Berger, 2004/05/06
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/06
[Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR, Jim Busser, 2004/05/06