Re: [Gnumed-devel] Fwd: Lab data support in OSCAR

[Jim Busser]

On May 6, 2004, at 10:24 AM, Hilmar Berger wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 11:46:25 +0200
> Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 1) only if reviewed_by_clinician is false may
> >    technically_abnormal be null
> Why this ? Shouldn't technically_abnormal be set automatically if 
> range information/status is available from the lab data ? What 
> relation has this flag to the clinicians decision ?

Maybe it means:
when lab has sent a result with specifying no value for 
technically_abnormal (i.e. the value is null)
and it is then reviewed by clinician
then value can no longer remain null
	(nor can it be set to back to null if it were already .T. or .F. 
though I know not if PostGres allows)
	i.e. technically_abnormal must be set and only be allowed to carry 
either .F. or .T.

Within the group of results being reviewed, efficient options would 
include:
        set all to normal (technically_normal to "true")
        set selected to normal (technically_normal to "true")
        set selected to abnormal (technically_normal to "false")

        set all to clinically irrelevant (clinically_relevant to "false")
        set selected to clinically relevant (clinically_relevant to "true")
	- i suppose we should include set selected... irrelevant to support 
reversing a wrong action