Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)

[Jim Busser]

On 8-Sep-09, at 8:28 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:02:30AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:

bitmaps

into --> /usr/share/gnumed/

... but why not into /usr/share/gnumed/Gnumed/

Why should it ?

Because in cvs, the directory hierarchy in the same level includes

client/bitmaps

...

client/pycommon

and so as far as establishing the top of the Python packages tree, when gnumed-client would get installed on a machine, it would have seemed to me less confusing to establish

/usr/share/gnumed/client

Even if we had seemed to saddle ourselves with

/usr/share/gnumed/Gnumed

with an import method

from Gnumed.pycommon import

it could be replaced with

from client.pycommon import

But the other thing is it remains in my mind opaque why to place the tarball's (client) bitmaps in

/usr/share/gnumed/

when in cvs they are at the same level as pycommon and other stuff, therefore why not into

/usr/share/gnumed/client (oops!)

/usr/share/gnumed/Gnumed