[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
From: |
Andreas Tille |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention) |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:36:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:36:09PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> The Debian package does not keep a copy of the tarball
>
> GnuPublicLicense.txtGnuPublicLicense.txt
>
> because the text exists already in
>
> text already in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL
>
> however the above defaults to point to GPL 3 so should maybe point
> instead to GPL2
Well, that's just a bug! For sure it should point to the right license.
I fixed this in SVN (so there is no need to fire up reportbug).
> Andreas does provide a separate file (of which I am not sure the exact
> source) but in
>
> /usr/share/doc/gnumed-client/copyright
It's actually not me who simply provides this it is Debian Policy that
requires this (no official Debian package without this file does exist).
> he has the following which may be worth keeping as a file in the cvs and
> also in the tarball at
>
> /client/copyright
>
> beginning at "Authors:" ??
>
> ========================
>
> This package was debianized by Andreas Tille <address@hidden> on
> Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:48:14 +0200.
I changed this now (SVN) to the new machine readable format described at
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Klarmachen zum Ändern!
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention),
Andreas Tille <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/13
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08