Re: Release schedule

[Yen-Ju Chen]

> From: "Chris B. Vetter" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Release schedule
> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:00:22 -0800
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:02:15 -0600
> Andrew Ruder <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I'd definitely second that.  At this point I don't even care what we
> > go with (Cocoa or OpenStep), but at some point there must be a
> > decision, and when that decision is made, keep to it and document it.
>
> _Especially_ the latter. It's pretty frustrating to check GNUstep's HTML
> documentation and all you'll get is something like:
>
>   + (float) menuBarHeight
>
>     Description forthcoming.
>
> *sigh*
>
>   :0> cd opt/GNUstep/System/Documentation/Developer/Base/Reference
>   :0> grep "Description forthcoming" * | wc -l
>       2273
>   :0> cd ../../Gui/Reference
>   :0> grep "Description forthcoming" * | wc -l
>       8072
>
> --
> Chris

 This is a real good point.
 The lack of document make me always check the Cocoa docuement.
 Maybe that's why GNUstep API always change because Cocoa always change. :)
 If it is legel, put the OPENSTEP docuemtn on www.gnustep.org
 and modify it according to the GNUstep implementation.
 Any change of API would be a major release
 so that application developer don't need to chase the CVS
 in order to make the application work.

 Just my little thought.

 Yen-Ju

> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail