[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package
|
From: |
Adam Fedor |
|
Subject: |
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:53:59 -0600 |
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 05:47 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
Yes ... isn't that what we are aiming to do? I thought that the
distributions
now contained pre-built documentation (not an issue that I'm familiar
with
as I use CVS of course). If that's not the case, we probably need
makefile
support for doing it ...
It's not pre-built in the distribution by default. I make the
distribution based on CVS, and since the html files are not in CVS,
they aren't included. I could look at changing the distribution
procedure to build the docs before I tar/gzip it...
- Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/21
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Adam Fedor, 2003/07/21
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/07/22
- Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package,
Adam Fedor <=
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Nicola Pero, 2003/07/22
Re: Making autogsdoc a separate package, Helge Hess, 2003/07/22