|
From: | MJ Ray |
Subject: | Re: [Gnustep-marketing] GNUstep Foundation |
Date: | Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:25:52 +0100 |
--- MJ Ray <address@hidden> wrote:I can... Because it would be managed by people who have little to do with theOn 2004-09-30 14:11:48 +0100 QuentinI'm all for it too. A foundation dedicated to GNUstep is probably the best choice from the legitimacy and visibility points of view.Can you explain why?actual GNUstep project.
Huh? I would expect that to make the Foundation less legitimate in most people's eyes.
still waiting for Adam Fedor to say if he's asked FSF whether we can do mostof the tax-break stuff through them, without the overheads of our own corporation.[...] takecontrol out of the hands of those who have the most to do with the project, no disrespect intended to RMS or the FSF. I'm really not sure what thierresponse will be.
It need not remove control. It would surely remove some bureaucracy from the developers. Let's not prejudge their response if we don't know. I know GNOME broke away, but they are a special case in some ways. I will go read up on their foundation a bit. If anyone has a good reference, please tell me.
If visibility is the concern, does this need to be "GNUstep Foundation"Similar to the GNOME Foundation and the Apache Foundation, yes it does.rather than "GNUstep Marketing Foundation" or "GNUstep Promotion Association"?
Why? Just to ape GNOME?I worry that marketing is trying to lead development, instead of assisting it. My question about verifying the suggested problems has gone unanswered as yet.
This discussion seems to be cc'd to a gnustep-dev list: is that in the gnu.*The feeling was that not enough people were on the address@hiddennewsgroups too?list yet.
I wanted to know whether I can read gnustep-dev as a newsgroup, not why this was cc'd.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |