[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN
From: |
Hubert Chan |
Subject: |
Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:53:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:58:20 +0200 (CEST), "Nicola Pero" <address@hidden> said:
>>> Things should be decoupled ... -make and -base don't really talk or
>>> depend on each other.
>>
>> Not entirely true. Currently -base depends on -make for
>> configuration.
>>
> Thanks, I see your point ... which is a very good one :-)
> You're suggesting that, for example, in a binary distribution (say,
> Debian) you could install gnustep-base without installing
> gnustep-make.
Well, since you mention Debian... ;) Debian currently splits off parts
of gnustep-make into a package named gnustep-common. gnustep-common
includes GNUstep.conf, openapp, GNUstep.sh, etc... all the stuff that a
regular user might want for running GNUstep programs, without all the
Makefiles.
(It's nice to be on a mailing list where, when someone wants to use a
binary distribution in an example, it's usually Debian. ;) )
[...]
> I suppose the right way of addressing the issue is to create a
> 'gnustep-common' package, that only installs GNUstep.conf.
> Then, on top of that, you can install gnustep-make and/or
> gnustep-base; you only install gnustep-make if you want to build.
> We could make all this explicit by extracting the creation of
> GNUstep.conf into a separate software ... to be installed before
> gnustep-make. It sounds very clumsy though ;-)
> At the moment, I'd leave everything as it is (a packager could still
> install GNUstep.conf in a separate package to get the effect above).
I agree. My personal recommendation would be that, in terms of source
tarballs, you should keep GNUstep.conf inside gnustep-make. If someone
downloads the sources, well, they'll need gnustep-make anyways. Then
you can let the binary distributors do what they want, and split off a
gnustep-common package if they want to. Of course, I'm biased, because
that's how we're doing things in Debian. ;)
--
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: address@hidden - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, (continued)
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/10/10
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Dennis Leeuw, 2006/10/10
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Nicola Pero, 2006/10/10
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Sheldon Gill, 2006/10/12
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Nicola Pero, 2006/10/12
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Sheldon Gill, 2006/10/12
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Nicola Pero, 2006/10/12
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/10/13
- Re: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN,
Hubert Chan <=
RE: GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN, Adam Fedor, 2006/10/11