Re: [gpsd-dev] libgps?

[Hal Murray]

> I am.  Having heard no objections to my heads-up early this morning, I'm
> planning to move us to always statically linking binaries while still
> installing the shlib for third-party use.  That will eliminate two build
> options and solve a whole raft of problems. 

Seems reasonable to me.

I'd like to understand why you/we can't make it work.   Shared libraries seem 
like something that should be mainstream.

Is the problem that gpsd is trying to maintain the library and a client in 
the same package?

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.