Re: Naming, hacking, and policies

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>>>> I still think this change should be reverted
>>>
>>> I also think so.
>>
>> I’d also be in favor of reverting.
>
> I’m also in favour.  A pure revert would not be enough, though, would
> it?  The new names would need to remain as deprecated names (I know of
> at least one person who installed some of these games under the long
> names).

Indeed.  So I reverted one in commit
e23f2ff1836e982fc2289093aab0994e0c0cf2d2 (this particular rename broke a
unit test.)  As you can see in this commit, it’s mostly a matter of
swapping the package names between the deprecated and the non-deprecated
variant.

Any takers?  Thoughts?

Thanks,
Ludo’.