[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:42:59 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) |
* Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
<help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> [2021-02-10 22:33]:
> Jean Louis wrote:
>
> > There is no danger in shell as C-z almost in all cases means
> > "suspend job". Any other editor I know in shell is suspended
> > by C-z.
>
> The other day I wrote that it didn't work with tmux. But that
> was incorrect, it was zsh that made it not work.
>
> With bash, it works both ways (`suspend-frame', then fg) in
> a plain Linux VT (tty) but also in a VT with tmux on top.
>
> In zsh, suspend-frame doesn't work in a tmux pane but it does
> work with a plain tty. However fg still doesn't work, it says
> the by-now familiar 'no job control in this shell'.
>
> zsh should be one of the more common shells these days, while
> not as common as bash, of course. Still common enough to make
> one hesitant about the degree of standardization in this case.
What I know is that I learned job control very early when learning
about the shell and I use it frequently. I do expect from each shell
program to allow me to suspend it. Those running and listing programs
must be also interruptable. And I also expect to be able to stop the
output by using Control-S. This I am writing here not related to
Emacs, but to give user experience testimony. That is how I have
worked over last decades.
Related to zsh:
http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Jobs-_0026-Signals.html
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, (continued)
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/09
- C-z, C-c, job control commands [was: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users], tomas, 2021/02/09
- Re: C-z, C-c, job control commands [was: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users], Skip Montanaro, 2021/02/09
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Marcin Borkowski, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/11
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/11
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Joost Kremers, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/12