[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users
From: |
Howard Melman |
Subject: |
Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:05:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (darwin) |
Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> Ctrl-Z is mentioned as suspending the job in almost every popular
> shell on GNU/Linux systems and BSD systems. Number of installations of
> those systems in Internet prevails. Administrators access it through
> shell.
I'm aware there are terminal emacs users, I'm just not one
of them. You seemed to have missed the part where I said
"In the terminal it's suspend and in the GUI move (and
rename via an alias) the ctl-x-5-map to C-z.".
I was proposing to leave the binding of C-z in terminal
emacs to be a suspend function and just change it in the GUI.
>> This then frees up C-x 5 as a prefix key. It's probably a
>> year too late (though this muscle memory can't be too strong
>> yet), but I'd move the C-x t tab-bar commands to C-x 5 and
>> free up the more convenient C-x t prefix for something else.
>> It's not as convenient as an unbound C-z but it's something.
>> And it also solves the wasted C-x 5 prefix in a terminal
>> which no one seems to care about :)
>
> I have been using C-x 5 numerous times today and every day, last year
> and last years. I hope that those user experiences may give you more
> insights.
Also the part where I said "I suspect this is changing
something too longstanding to be considered but the subject
is "not good proposal" so ..."
--
Howard
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, (continued)
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/11
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/11
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Robert Thorpe, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Joost Kremers, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Howard Melman, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users,
Howard Melman <=
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, ken, 2021/02/16
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/13
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/13
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/13
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/13
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/12
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/12