[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork.
From: |
al3xu5 / dotcommon |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork. |
Date: |
Sun, 27 May 2012 19:22:43 +0200 |
Il giorno venerdì 25/05/2012 20:41:20 CEST
"r. siddharth" <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> The Artwork present in the gNewSense web-site is going to be re-licensed
> to GNU Free Documentation License(GFDL), as it has been learned lately
> that the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GFDL
> are incompatible[1]. But before we can re-license the Artwork, it is
> required to get the approval of all contributors of the Artwork that is
> part of the gNewSense web-site.
>
> If you have contributed to the Artwork present in the gNewSense
> web-site, please intimate us about your approval/disapproval of the
> re-license of the Artwork to GFDL by sending a reply to this list. We'd
> appreciate if you provide us with your profile name (with which you
> uploaded your artwork to the gNewSense web-site) and the links to your
> Artwork in your reply.
profile name: alexus [1]
artwork: SLiM gNewSense theme [2]
I *DISAPPROVE* relicensing the artwork to GFDL.
Reasons below.
- As well stated in the GFDL preamble [3], it has been designed "in order to use
it for manuals for free software, because free software needs free
documentation" and FSF recommend it "principally for works whose purpose is
instruction or reference".
So using GFDL for artwork is NOT the right choice, especially if it is of
artwork used in a operating system (logos, wallpapers, themes, icons, buttons
etc.).
- Maybe there is a misunderstanding regarding what Brett Smith said [3][4]:
"The GFDL wants to cover everything. If you want it to cover everything
*minus* some specific part, you're working against the license's design
goals, and you'd need to provide an additional permission to make it happen.
And all this is true for CC BY-SA, too."
"You have three main options: have everything be under the GFDL, have
everything be under CC BY-SA, or keep your current dichotomy but make sure
all contributors provide extra permission for >>>wiki pages and artwork to
be combined<<< the way you currently lay out."
I think "everything" here should be meant as "any thing contained in the
GNS's website pages" (also take a look at the text between >>> <<<), while
excluding any other artwork used with the operating system (such as logos,
wallpapers, themes, icons, buttons etc.).
- Options (a) 'relicensing the artwork to GFDL' and (b) 'ask all contributors
to provide extra permission for wiki pages and artwork to be combined', both
require asking contributors to explicity release extra permission...
So, why ask for (a), which moreover lead to a inappropriate license for
artwork used with the operating system? Better ask for (b)!
- The GNS website says in the footer: "All documentation is available under the
terms of the GFDL with no invariant sections. Artwork is Free Cultural Work
and is available under the terms of the cc-by-sa license."
This should imply contributors have already realesed their textual works
under the GFDL and their artistic works under the CC BY-SA.
So choosing (b) probably DO NOT really require asking contributors to
explicity release any extra permission for *ALL* the artwork related with
GNS: maybe the extra permission is needed only for the images attached to the
webpages...
More, the extra permission required to combine GFDL and CC BY-SA *in the
web pages*, could be inserted in the footer in order to "automatically"
solve the license issue for any new contribution in the future.
- Using the GFDL for artwork may lead to more license issues than using the CC
BY-SA (for example when you want to reuse the artwork in a non-GDFL
context...)
For all these reasons I suggest:
- to *keep* the CC BY-SA license for all the artwork related with the operating
system (logos, wallpapers, themes, icons, buttons etc.)
- to license GNS's web pages under GFDL for texts and CC BY-SA for artwork
(images, videos etc.) inserted into the pages themselves (requesting extra
permissions just for these artworks, and updating the footer to
automatically obtain the permission to combine GFDL and CC BY-SA for any new
contribution in the future)
- alternatively, to license GNS's web pages under GFDL both for texts and
artwork (images, videos etc.) inserted into the pages themselves (requesting
extra permissions just for these artworks).
Regards
[1] http://www.gnewsense.org/alexus
[2]
http://www.gnewsense.org/ArtworkProjects/SlimGnewsense#About_the_SlimGnewsense_theme
[3] www.gnewsense.org/RelicensingArtwork
[4] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-dev/2012-05/msg00000.html
--
al3xu5 / dotcommon
Support free software! Join FSF: http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7535
______________________________________________________________________
Public GPG/PGP key block
ID: 1024D/11C70137
Fingerprint: 60F1 B550 3A95 7901 F410 D484 82E7 5377 11C7 0137
Key download: http://bitfreedom.noblogs.org/files/2010/08/dotcommon.asc
[ Please, DO NOT send my key to any keyserver! ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., r. siddharth, 2012/05/26
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork.,
al3xu5 / dotcommon <=
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., r. siddharth, 2012/05/27
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., al3xu5 / dotcommon, 2012/05/27
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., Sam Geeraerts, 2012/05/28
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., r. siddharth, 2012/05/28
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., al3xu5 / dotcommon, 2012/05/28
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., r. siddharth, 2012/05/29
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., Sam Geeraerts, 2012/05/29
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., r. siddharth, 2012/05/30
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., Sam Geeraerts, 2012/05/31
- Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork., alexus / dotcommon, 2012/05/28