Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.21 released

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:35:23 -0600, Derek Scherger 
<address@hidden> said:

derek> random thought, prompted by the fact that I don't know whether
derek> the --exclude value is persisted as a db var... would
derek> 
derek> MT/netsync/server
derek> MT/netsync/include
derek> MT/netsync/exclude
derek> 
derek> be a better place than the database for the defaults
derek> (i.e. current db vars)?
derek> 
derek> I've run into at least one case where I have two separate
derek> projects in one db (for no particular good reason) and the
derek> defaults only make sense for one of them.

I can agree with what you say.  At the same time, I find it very
comfortable to be able to go to the directory where I store all my
databases and do the following:

for x in db.*; do monotone push --db=$x; done

... without having to look further.

I'd recommend one database per consistent project or project group on
the client side.

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis