[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap
From: |
Ian Haywood |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 22:48:54 +1000 |
On Wed, 19 May 2004 19:13:37 +1000
sjtan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is it needed to connect the ldap match provider , or is there a built in
> package somewhere to
> make an ldap python connection.
These are separate issues
Yes an LDAP-based match provider class needs to be written along similar
lines to the SQL match providers that we have, if we decide to go down this
path.
> I was thinking of ldap organizational
> directory , but
> for database completeness, there would probably have to be postgres
> tables to store the same
> data.
Why? As I said, LDAP can run alongside the postgres database.
Ian
--
PGP public key E750652E at wwwkeys.pgp.net
9BF0 67B7 F84F F7EE 0C42 C063 28FC BC52 E750 652E
pgpIY2fDJxnxQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, sjtan, 2004/05/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap,
Ian Haywood <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Jim Busser, 2004/05/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Ian Haywood, 2004/05/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Horst Herb, 2004/05/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Ian Haywood, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Horst Herb, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Ian Haywood, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Horst Herb, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/20