gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major r


From: J Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:43:17 -0800

At 2:46 PM +0100 2/15/05, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
 > - Might web-enabling be a helpful stepping stone?
No. Helpful yes. Stepping stone likely not.

 Right now, it is EASY
 for people to LOOK at OSCAR. That is not possible with gnumed.
Well. People don't have a clue of what they are looking at. If
you really want a latest-technology SUV you cannot go check out
the second-hand cars at your local dumpster. But you may
decide that all you really need is a second hand standard.

Here is what I am thinking:

We will want doctors or their business managers or regional advisory groups (who might contribute public money to subsidize doctors' movement to full, or even partial, EMRs) to consider FOSS and specifically GnuMed but here is what we will be up against:

- vendors will crap (is this term used outside N America?) on FOSS

- business managers and regional advisory groups will be concerned about experience to date with FOSS and certainly, in Canada, the only medical experience to them will be with OSCAR. They will either

- - view it as a "possible solution"about which "some users / clinics / centres remain enthusiastic" which may cause these decision-makers to give preference to this "known, proven(?) entity" which can put GnuMed at a competitive disadvantage to get established especially for things like "seed money" and especially if OSCAR becomes more established, --OR--

- - discern that some challenges exist with OSCAR structurally and functionally (including how to not have the investments later fall flat from lack of support).

The doctors can be a source of advocacy for what will meet their needs, ideally in a robust fashion so our challenge is to get their attention. I was thinking that a browser might be deployable in a short enough time frame to permit catching up to some of OSCAR's basic functionality, so that potential users (or decision-makers over pilot projects) could have their choice of OSCAR or GnuMed. I was NOT thinking of a browser as a stepping stone to a browser growing into a primary long term solution... just as a flexible means of providing early PARTIAL access to GnuMed. I WAS thinking as a stepping stone to ESTABLISH GnuMed as something deserving more consideration, and its ADOPTION by enough groups to remain viable.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]