[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding
From: |
Manuel Guesdon |
Subject: |
Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:42:35 +0100 (CET) |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:00:57 -0700 Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
>| Manuel Guesdon wrote:
>|
>| >
>| > It's an option but what's wrong with the current 'license'/condition of
>use of extensions ?
>| >
>|
>|
>| There's nothing inherently 'wrong' with the license, in fact it seems to
>| be GPL-compatible (as far as I can see), similar to the X11 license
>| (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html).
>|
>| This makes it a fairly permissive license, however. For instance, you
>| could take the library and add your own code and resell the library as a
>| proprietary produce (and not release the source code).
OK. So if we want to use extensions, there's no need to re-implement extensions
classes nor to contact authors to change
licenses, isn't it ?
Manuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <address@hidden>
14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement - 93200 Saint-Denis - France
Tel: +33 1 4940 0999 - Fax: +33 1 4940 0998
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, (continued)
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/24
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/24
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/02/25
- Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[4]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Manuel Guesdon, 2002/02/25
- Re: Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding, Nicola Pero, 2002/02/25
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/25
- Re[2]: EOKeyValueCoding,
Manuel Guesdon <=
- Re: EOKeyValueCoding, Adam Fedor, 2002/02/27
Re: EOKeyValueCoding, David Wetzel, 2002/02/24