On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:00:57 -0700 Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
>| Manuel Guesdon wrote:
>|
>| >
>| > It's an option but what's wrong with the current 'license'/condition of use of extensions ?
>| >
>|
>|
>| There's nothing inherently 'wrong' with the license, in fact it seems to
>| be GPL-compatible (as far as I can see), similar to the X11 license
>| (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html).
>|
>| This makes it a fairly permissive license, however. For instance, you
>| could take the library and add your own code and resell the library as a
>| proprietary produce (and not release the source code).
OK. So if we want to use extensions, there's no need to re-implement extensions
classes nor to contact authors to change
licenses, isn't it ?