gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving the bug system to GNA....


From: Banlu Kemiyatorn
Subject: Re: Moving the bug system to GNA....
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 00:54:11 +0700

Sorry, I just read your first line!

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn <address@hidden> wrote:
> Could we add a script to Makefile and leave the svn alone for a while
> until most are updated to the script? Could be fun to think that it
> will actually work out remotely or not.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.05.2011 um 19:02 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
>>
>>> Hey guys... this isn't a direct response to Nicola, I'm just adding a
>>> few more thoughts here.
>>>
>>> Simply put we either need GNUstep to be on either savannah or GNA.
>>> My concern about moving it back to savannah is that it would be
>>> disruptive for anyone who has GNUstep currently checked out.
>>
>> I think it is quite easy to solve by the
>>
>>        svn switch --relocate ...
>>
>> command [1]. This just updates a checked out repository to point to
>> a different server. Maybe, even the makefile could have a rule to
>> recognize this situation (by svn info) and recommend a command...
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikolaus
>>
>> [1] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/re27.html
>>
>>> Additionally, I would argue that if we were to make a move back to
>>> savannah then a wholesale rethought regarding how the repository is
>>> currently structured is in order since the way it is now is somewhat
>>> convoluted.
>>>
>>> Later, GC
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Nicola Pero
>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> I simply would like to have things in one place.   Right now we're
>>>>> spread between GNA and Savannah.
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like a good idea - I support it.
>>>>
>>>> But, I would recommend that:
>>>>
>>>>  * we put up extensive announcements on the web site, mailing list, etc.
>>>>
>>>>  * we try to migrate over the open bugs.  I had a quick look in Savannah,
>>>> and you can export
>>>> all the bugs as an XML blob.  So presumably, you'd export them in that
>>>> format, then write a short
>>>> script to import them all into the new one (using wget or curl ?).  Unless
>>>> GNA allows you to import
>>>> them in block, or the GNA developers are willing to help. :-)
>>>>
>>>>  * if there's nothing left in savannah, it may be worthwhile putting 
>>>> notices
>>>> there pointing people to the GNA
>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc.
>>> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
>>> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>     .----.     Banlu Kemiyatorn
>   /.../\...\   漫画家
>  |.../  \...|  http://qstx.blogspot.com (Free Software Advocacy & Development)
>  |../    \..|  http://feedbat.blogspot.com (Studio Work For Hire)
>   \/      \/   http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com (Studio Research)
>



-- 
    .----.     Banlu Kemiyatorn
  /.../\...\   漫画家
 |.../  \...|  http://qstx.blogspot.com (Free Software Advocacy & Development)
 |../    \..|  http://feedbat.blogspot.com (Studio Work For Hire)
  \/      \/   http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com (Studio Research)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]