Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!

[Paul Brook]

On Monday 26 May 2003 10:42 am, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>   I was thinking that we keep the stub lib as a stub, ( perhaps in
> libgomp/lib/stub ) and then populate a different set for the different
> targets. MPI seem's to be a very popular target for OpenMP
> compilers/translaters to support :-) ... good to know that you be up to
> date on everything.
>
>   Well, I will try to 'manually' translate some of the openmp examples
> or code tailored to exercise the lib into 'hardcoded gcc code
> generation' a'la exa, probably by taking a GOOD look at treelang.

I wouldn't bother trying to create treelang or hardcoded gcc code generation, 
it's really not plesant.
For the purposes of testing the library can't we just write the test code in 
C, but with all the openMP stuff repaced with explicit calls to the library? 
At worst you just complie with -O0 to prevent the oprimizers doing evil 
things to concurrent code.

Paul Brook