On Monday 26 May 2003 10:42 am, Lars Segerlund wrote:
I was thinking that we keep the stub lib as a stub, ( perhaps in
libgomp/lib/stub ) and then populate a different set for the different
targets. MPI seem's to be a very popular target for OpenMP
compilers/translaters to support :-) ... good to know that you be up to
date on everything.
Well, I will try to 'manually' translate some of the openmp examples
or code tailored to exercise the lib into 'hardcoded gcc code
generation' a'la exa, probably by taking a GOOD look at treelang.
I wouldn't bother trying to create treelang or hardcoded gcc code generation,
it's really not plesant.
For the purposes of testing the library can't we just write the test code in
C, but with all the openMP stuff repaced with explicit calls to the library?
At worst you just complie with -O0 to prevent the oprimizers doing evil
things to concurrent code.
Paul Brook
_______________________________________________
Gomp-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss