[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good! |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2003 11:19:49 +0100 (BST) |
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Paul Brook wrote:
> For the purposes of testing the library can't we just write the test code in
> C, but with all the openMP stuff repaced with explicit calls to the library?
> At worst you just complie with -O0 to prevent the oprimizers doing evil
> things to concurrent code.
>
That sounds a good proposal. So can I assume that we go on writing the
library, for the moment using POSIX threads?
Biagio
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, (continued)
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Steven Bosscher, 2003/05/26
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Lars Segerlund, 2003/05/26
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Biagio Lucini, 2003/05/26
- [Gomp-discuss] Library foundation?, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Library foundation?, Biagio Lucini, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Lars Segerlund, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Lars Segerlund, 2003/05/26
- [Gomp-discuss] Stub Library, Scott Robert Ladd, 2003/05/26
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Paul Brook, 2003/05/28
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Lars Segerlund, 2003/05/30
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!,
Biagio Lucini <=
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CVS Good!, Steven Bosscher, 2003/05/30