Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms (was: EQN - special words)

[Damian McGuckin]

On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, G. Branden Robinson wrote:

> >         (x sup 2)
> >
> > The 2) is NOT a thing. It is two separate things where there is a
> > missing seperator because of a user error.
>
> Right.

Thanks. I hope I get it right after 40 years!

> > How should I define 'thing' before I start talking about it?
>
> My solution (of recent vintage) in eqn(1) has been to leave our CS
> brains exposed and use the word "token".

The original User Guide has no CS brains within earshot so I was hoping to 
avoid that word.

I might sleep on it ... for a few nights. Public holiday here this weekend

Thanks - Damian