[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Overnet 0.42
From: |
MLdonkey |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Overnet 0.42 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Dec 2002 22:27:41 +0100 |
> I'm sorry to say that I won't have time in the following weeks to help
> with this update :(
Don't worry, enjoy your holidays !
> However, it seems in my last traces that the UDP overnet protocol didn't
> change. This makes sense, as the TCP-dl-protocol and the
> UDP-search/connect-protocol are distinct entities. I found during my
> firewalled-peers work that there are new opcodes in TCP that mldonkey
> does not know about. Getting traces with between 2 official 0.42 clients
> should be quite easy though.
Yes, I think it is the rank on the upload queue which is sent with
opcode 92. I think eMule does something similar.
> I do agree that we should mimic as closely as possible the overnet-TCP
> behaviour in a separate TCP port, on which we remove any
> mldonkey/edonkey-specific extensions :) Having an specific TCP and UDP
> port for overnet, we may be able mimic overnet protocol as closely as we
> want.
Well, I'm beta-testing a version from Simon with a new TCP port for
overnet (edonkeyport+1), but currently, I haven't got even one
connection, so it is hard to tell. When I force the client to connect
to a local overnet client, the client does not issue an "invalid
client", so it might be OK. Simon didn't commit this version, because
you need at least 1 GB free on disk just for the debugging messages :)
If we have better results, a commit should happen (hope before christmas).
- MLDonkey
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Latest CVS after 10min, (continued)