|
| From: | Sune Jeppesen |
| Subject: | Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: FAQ, Patches, Stalled-Forever Downloads, Slowness, Settings |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:07:50 +0100 |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5 |
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 05:01, Christian Kohrn wrote:
> Sorry, forgot it: run it 2 days and 18 hours
>
> Christian Kohrn schrieb:
> > Michael Panteleit wrote:
> >> How long do you run mldonkey typically? I guess the shorter the worse
> >> because you have to wait a few hours to get up in their queue.
> > No...
> > Max Emule-Slots at 40%
> >
> > Total downloads: 1699091505
> > new eMule: 607798209 (35.77 %)
> > Total uploads: 7401454343
> > new eMule: 6080170099 (82.15 %)
Here is my stats with all 6 pango patches from early yesterday (before the new
combined release). As you can see I have actually managed to download MORE
form emule than they have downloaded.
Max_emule_slots 33
Uptime: 76509 seconds (0+21:15)
Total seens: 30058
eDonkey: 19 (0.06 %)
Total downloads: 997941722
eDonkey: 333064163 (33.38 %)
old mldonkey: 6200768 (0.62 %)
new eMule: 462831943 (46.38 %)
Total uploads: 434180096
eDonkey: 11941218 (2.75 %)
old mldonkey: 133373817 (30.72 %)
new mldonkey: 81386799 (18.74 %)
new eMule: 182849014 (42.11 %)
Total banneds: 291
old mldonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 291 (100.00 %)
It seems like we should rather ban old mldonkey than emule. At least according
to my stats.
/Sune
PS: Anyone got a clue to why I always download so much from so few edonkey
clients?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |