[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gs vs. xpdf
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: gs vs. xpdf |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:46:19 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 17:12:33 (+0200), Ludovic Courtès wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Lout website
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Mark Summerfield wrote:
> > Lout 3.28 seems to produce PostScript with textures that ghostview can't
> > display, but doesn't choke on: it just shows whitespace instead. The
> > textures print beautifully but ghostscript can't convert PostScript that
> > has these textures into PDF -- even version 8.00 just dies with a stack
> > trace. This is a great pity, but not lout's fault of course.
>
> Actually GNU GS 7.05 _does_ succeed in converting PS files that
> contain textures into PDF files. Xpdf is able to display textures
> properly then.
Hmmm, but GNU GS itself cannot display what it creates? Curious!
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden> Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Re: Lout website, (continued)
- Re: Lout website, Jeff Kingston, 2003/07/28
- Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/29
- Re: Lout website, Jeremy Cowgar, 2003/07/29
- Re: Lout website, K. H. Man, 2003/07/29
- Re: Lout website, Greg A. Woods, 2003/07/29
- Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/30
- Re: Lout website, Greg A. Woods, 2003/07/30
- Re: Lout website, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/07/30
- Re: Lout website, Mark Summerfield, 2003/07/30
- Re: Lout website, Ludovic Courtès, 2003/07/30
- Re: gs vs. xpdf,
Greg A. Woods <=
- Re: Lout website, K. H. Man, 2003/07/30
Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/29
Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/30
Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/30
Re: Lout website, Sébastien Pierre, 2003/07/30
Re: Lout website, JamesClementsIII, 2003/07/30