Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: is monotone for me?

[CooSoft Support]

   Yup that is an understatement - one of the reasons why I was 
attracted to the project... When the biggest cause of corruption seems 
to be faulty RAID hardware then you know that you are onto a winner.

   I did some tests, with the aide of one of the developers, to 
simulate corruption (I was worried about faulty desktop disks corrupting 
other databases on sync). It was damn difficult to get it past the local 
mtn process without it detecting it and then pretty much impossible (I 
never got it to sync with a corrupted db - but very difficult to prove a 
negative etc) to get it past the sync stage :-).

address@hidden wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:41:50PM +0100, CooSoft Support wrote:
>   
> > It has proved to be 
> > totally reliable
> >     
>
> That's for me is the most important thing about monotone, trumping all 
> other considerations.  The monotone developers are more paranoid about 
> data loss than I am.
>
> -- hendrik.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
>