www-es-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-traductores] Revisión de /philosophy/install-fest-devil.html


From: Dora Scilipoti
Subject: Re: [GNU-traductores] Revisión de /philosophy/install-fest-devil.html
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:58:19 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

On 04/22/2019 08:11 PM, Dora Scilipoti wrote:

> =========================================================
> Párrafos que quedan por traducir:
> 
> The install fest should offer advice to users that would like to replace
> some of the machine's components with alternatives that do support free
> software, and recommend commercial and noncommercial sources of
> assistance including fsf.org/resources/hw for getting a computer that
> works fully without nonfree drivers and blobs.
> 
> It should also suggest to these users that they send letters of
> criticism to the companies that make or sell the components that depend
> on nonfree software to function.
> 
> The install-fest devil has nothing to do with the cute BSD demon, and
> the install fest should make that very clear. This issue concerns the
> difference between various GNU/Linux distros, and is not about BSD.
> Indeed, the same approach could be used for installation of BSD.
> 
> This devil would be a human being disguised to teach a moral lesson
> with a theatrical metaphor, so let's not take the metaphor too far.  I
> think we would do well not to say that users are “selling their souls”
> if they install nonfree software—rather, part of their own freedom
> is what they forfeit.  We don't need to exaggerate to teach the point
> that trading your freedom for convenience (and leading others to do
> the same) is
> <a href="https://www.fsfla.org/circular/2007-02.en.html#1";>
> putting yourself in a moral jam</a>.
> 
> The devil's work would be something I don't approve of—installing
> nonfree software—so I will not get involved in discussing the practical
> details. But it is hard to trust a devil to do wrong only within certain
> limits. What is to stop the devil from offering to install a GNU/Linux
> distro such as Ubuntu, which offers the user other attractive nonfree
> programs, not solely the ones needed for the machine's hardware to
> function at all? Or even offering to install Windows? The people who run
> the install fest should ask some users what the devil did to their
> computers.
> 
> Isn't it morally better if the install fest doesn't allow the devil?
> Certainly! The FSF will not let a devil hang around its events. But
> given the fact that most install fests quietly play the role of the
> devil, I think that an explicit devil would be less bad. It would
> convert the install-fest dilemma from a debilitating contradiction into
> a teaching experience. Users would be able to get, if they insist, the
> nonfree drivers to make their peripherals run, then use GNU/Linux
> knowing that there is a further step toward freedom that they should take.
> ==================================================================


¿Alguien está traduciendo alguno de esos párrafos? Si no, esta noche
tarde (alrededor de las 23 hora CET) envío los tres primeros.



-- 
Dora Scilipoti
GNU Education Team
gnu.org/education



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]