[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bontz-team] static linking
From: |
Owen Swerkstrom |
Subject: |
Re: [Bontz-team] static linking |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:23:56 -0700 (PDT) |
d'oh, i forgot. I'll have to wait 'til i get home ...
again. :^)
--- Chuck <address@hidden> wrote:
> well the reason i thought of static linking is
> because i wanted to send the
> binary to someone and i doubt they had all the sdl
> libs required.
> he was interested in bontz and so i was going to try
> to show him the stupid
> little demo.
>
> this person is a cs person, but not much of a linux
> user.
>
> btw did you get a chance to see the demo?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Owen Swerkstrom" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:17 PM
> Subject: [Bontz-team] static linking
>
>
> > Good question... No, I don't know how to do a
> static
> > link to sdl_image or _mixer. The documentation at
> > http://jcatki.no-ip.org/SDL_image/ doesn't discuss
> > static linking, and a quick google search didn't
> turn
> > up anything fruitful for me either. Not that
> we'll
> > have to worry about distributing static binaries
> for
> > some time, until we actually get something worth
> > showing off to unwashed masses. But I'll keep my
> eyes
> > open for any such information. Compared to the
> > images, music, video etc that we'll have all
> packed
> > into bontz tarballs as game demos, alphas, betas
> etc
> > eventually get done, sdl_image and _mixer are
> pretty
> > small, so if we're worried about people having to
> get
> > them separately we could put copies right in with
> our
> > tarball, hell we could include SDL itself, and
> during
> > our "./configure && make" process we could have it
> > check and build anything that's missing.
> > ...
> > ...not that that has anything to do with your
> > question. Hah. that's the trouble with these
> lists,
> > you can't interactively smack me and tell me to
> shut
> > up when i ramble.
> >
> > > any ideas on how to statically link the binary?
> > > i think i could do it if it were just the base
> SDL
> > > libs, but the image and
> > > mixer libs are causing me trouble
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bontz-team mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bontz-team
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bontz-team mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bontz-team
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
- [Bontz-team] poles in the water, Owen Swerkstrom, 2003/06/17
- Re: [Bontz-team] poles in the water, Chuck, 2003/06/17
- Re: [Bontz-team] poles in the water, Chuck, 2003/06/18
- Re: [Bontz-team] poles in the water, Chuck, 2003/06/18
- [Bontz-team] crAnimation, Owen Swerkstrom, 2003/06/18
- Re: [Bontz-team] crAnimation, Chuck, 2003/06/18
- [Bontz-team] static linking, Owen Swerkstrom, 2003/06/18
- Re: [Bontz-team] static linking, Chuck, 2003/06/18
- Re: [Bontz-team] static linking,
Owen Swerkstrom <=
- Re: [Bontz-team] poles in the water, Owen Swerkstrom, 2003/06/18