Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

groff (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Fri Jan 31 2003 09:46:11 -0500 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• [Groff] Vim input expansion keyboard map, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/31
• [Groff] i) An apology, ii) UTP indexing, Ch.11 & AppB, Manas Laha, 2003/01/30
• [Groff] Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, kollar, 2003/01/29
  • Re: [Groff] Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Larry Jones, 2003/01/29
  • [Groff] Re: Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Meg McRoberts, 2003/01/29
    • [Groff] Re: Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/30
      • Re: [Groff] Re: Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2003/01/30
      • Re: [Groff] Re: Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/31
      • Re: [Groff] Re: Old *roff utilities - found a diffmk, any checkmm?, Jon Snader, 2003/01/31
• [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Zoong PHAM, 2003/01/28
  • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/01/29
    • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Thomas Baruchel, 2003/01/29
      • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/29
    • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Jon Snader, 2003/01/29
      • [Groff] Macro packages (was: need advice on choosing a macro), Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2003/01/29
      • Re: [Groff] Macro packages (was: need advice on choosing a macro), Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/30
    • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/29
      • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/01/29
      • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Colin Watson, 2003/01/29
    • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Zoong PHAM, 2003/01/31
      • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/31
      • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Colin Watson, 2003/01/31
  • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Jon Snader, 2003/01/29
  • Re: Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, kollar, 2003/01/29
    • Re: Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/29
  • Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, kollar, 2003/01/29
  • Re: Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, kollar, 2003/01/29
    • Re: Re: [Groff] need advice on choosing a macro, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/29
• [Groff] UTP index - chapter 15, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/28
• Re: address@hidden wrote: > > Send Groff mailing list submissions to > address@hidden > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/groff > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > address@hidden > > You can reach the person managing the list at > address@hidden > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Groff digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Building GROFF (John Poltorak) > 2. Re: Building GROFF (Werner LEMBERG) > 3. Re: Query about .special (Robert D. Goulding) > 4. Re: Query about .special (Robert D. Goulding) > 5. Re: Query about .special (Werner LEMBERG) > 6. UTP - let's start indexing! (Larry Kollar) > 7. Re: Building GROFF (Werner LEMBERG) > 8. Re: Building GROFF (John Poltorak) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:13:41 +0000 > From: John Poltorak <address@hidden> > To: address@hidden > Subject: [Groff] Building GROFF > > Is there a FAQ relating to building GROFF? > > I'm hoping to build it on OS/2 and would like to know where to look > if/when I have some problems. > > -- > John > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:45:26 +0100 (CET) > To: address@hidden > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Groff] Building GROFF > From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> > > > Is there a FAQ relating to building GROFF? > > Have a look at > > http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~vtgf3mpr/indxos2.htm > > SAWATAICHI Jun <address@hidden> has ported groff 1.17.2 to OS/2; > I don't know whether newer ports are available. > > My final goal is to make groff compile out of the box on OS/2 also: > Some of his changes are already in the current sources, some aren't. > It seems that Jun hasn't much time to work on it... > > In case you are a programmer you could try current CVS snapshots, > providing modifications based on Jun's patches. > > > I'm hoping to build it on OS/2 and would like to know where to look > > if/when I have some problems. > > Write to this list, probably with a CC to Jun. > > Werner > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:55:38 -0500 (EST) > From: "Robert D. Goulding" <address@hidden> > To: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> > cc: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Groff] Query about .special > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > My second question. Assuming that I can map the characters \[Fi] > > > etc. correctly; how do I get groff to use them automatically for > > > ligatures in text? I assume I need a ligatures entry in the font > > > file; but do the more complex ligatures get added to the line > > > already in DAR, or do I put a line for them in DAX? > > > > What you want is not possible (yet). I wonder whether I shall > > implement something like that. OTOH, the whole ligature mechanism has > > to be redone to enable more ligatures than ff, fi, fl, ffi, and ffl: > > Instead of handling ligatures specially I will probably introduce > > fontsets, making this problem vanish completely. > > > > > Thanks for making this clear - I had half-expected that groff wouldn't be > able to find ligatures in special fonts and automatically replace, say, > `ffi' with \[Fi] (which is an unfortunate limitation - basically makes > expert fonts unusable; I look forward to the `fontset' enhancement). > WHat surprises me, though, is that it cannot find the glyph \[Fi] when it > is *specifically requested* using a \[] construct. I.e., the special font > has a glyph Fi defined, but \[Fi] uses the fall-back instead of the > proper, available glyph. This strikes me as a bug rather than a > limitation. > > Robert. > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:01:38 -0500 (EST) > From: "Robert D. Goulding" <address@hidden> > To: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> > cc: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Groff] Query about .special > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > What surprises me, though, is that it cannot find the glyph \[Fi] > > > when it is *specifically requested* using a \[] construct. I.e., > > > the special font has a glyph Fi defined, but \[Fi] uses the > > > fall-back instead of the proper, available glyph. This strikes me > > > as a bug rather than a limitation. > > > > Using .schar instead of .fchar to define a fall-back \[Fi] is a > > possibility but perhaps not the right solution, given that `f' + `f' + > > `i' from the current font usually looks much better than a ligature > > glyph \[Fi] from a different font. > > > > Fall-back glyph definitions can be removed easily. This should work, > > assuming that DAR has no \[Fi] and DAX has: > > > > .fspecial DAR DAX > > .rchar \[Fi] > > \[Fi] > > > > Yes, it does work; thanks very much. Now, at least, I can > substitute by hand some of the ffi s. > > RObert. > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:35:10 +0100 (CET) > To: address@hidden > Cc: address@hidden > Subject: Re: [Groff] Query about .special > From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> > > > What surprises me, though, is that it cannot find the glyph \[Fi] > > when it is *specifically requested* using a \[] construct. I.e., > > the special font has a glyph Fi defined, but \[Fi] uses the > > fall-back instead of the proper, available glyph. This strikes me > > as a bug rather than a limitation. > > Using .schar instead of .fchar to define a fall-back \[Fi] is a > possibility but perhaps not the right solution, given that `f' + `f' + > `i' from the current font usually looks much better than a ligature > glyph \[Fi] from a different font. > > Fall-back glyph definitions can be removed easilyRe: [Groff] UTP - let's start indexing!, Manas Kumar Laha, 2003/01/28
  • [Groff] Re: address@hidden wrote: <snip />, Andy Fletcher, 2003/01/28
• [Groff] UTP - let's start indexing!, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/27
• [Groff] Building GROFF, John Poltorak, 2003/01/27
  • Re: [Groff] Building GROFF, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/27
  • Re: [Groff] Building GROFF, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/28
    • Re: [Groff] Building GROFF, John Poltorak, 2003/01/28
      • Re: [Groff] Building GROFF, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/28
      • Re: [Groff] Building GROFF, John Poltorak, 2003/01/29
• [Groff] hyphenation exceptions, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/27
• [Groff] Re: {SPAM?} Groff digest, Vol 1 #1050 - 10 msgs, Larry McVoy, 2003/01/24
  • Re: [Groff] Re: {SPAM?} Groff digest, Vol 1 #1050 - 10 msgs, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/27
• [Groff] Query about .special, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/24
  • Re: [Groff] Query about .special, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/26
    • Re: [Groff] Query about .special, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/27
      • Re: [Groff] Query about .special, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/27
      • Re: [Groff] Query about .special, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/27
• [Groff] Clarification on UTP indexing, Michael Hobgood, 2003/01/23
  • Re: [Groff] Clarification on UTP indexing, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/23
• [Groff] UTP Indexing, Michael Hobgood, 2003/01/23
  • Re: [Groff] UTP Indexing, Jon Snader, 2003/01/23
  • [Groff] UTP indexing, Michael Hobgood, 2003/01/23
  • [Groff] UTP indexing, Michael Hobgood, 2003/01/29
  • [Groff] UTP indexing, Redman Jack, 2003/01/31
• [Groff] Compiled UTP..., Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/22
  • Re: [Groff] Compiled UTP..., Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/23
    • Re: [Groff] Compiled UTP..., Larry Kollar, 2003/01/23
• [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/21
  • Re: [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/22
    • CVS broken. Was: Re: [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/23
      • Re: CVS broken. Was: Re: [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/23
      • Re: CVS broken. Was: Re: [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/23
  • Re: [Groff] PS font metrics change (again), Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/22
• [Groff] Re: Bug#176575: mdoc: .Dt ignores volume name, Colin Watson, 2003/01/20
• [Groff] mailing list index buttons, schramm-i-am, 2003/01/18
• [Groff] Column-wrapping output of .TC in ms, Timothy Groves, 2003/01/16
• [Groff] OT: troff fonts, Ayan George, 2003/01/16
• [Groff] typos in utp, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/15
  • [Groff] more on utp, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/16
• [Groff] confused by soelim, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/14
  • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2003/01/14
    • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/14
  • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2003/01/15
    • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/15
      • Re: [Groff] soelim for TeX, Hartmut Henkel, 2003/01/15
  • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/15
    • Re: [Groff] confused by soelim, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/15
    • $REFER doc patch (was Re: [Groff] confused by soelim), Jorgen Grahn, 2003/01/16
      • [Groff] Re: $REFER doc patch, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/16
• [Groff] preparing for nroff vrs html output?, groff, 2003/01/10
  • Re: [Groff] preparing for nroff vrs html output?, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/10
    • Re: [Groff] preparing for nroff vrs html output?, groff, 2003/01/10
      • Re: [Groff] preparing for nroff vrs html output?, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/10
  • [Groff] SUMMARY: Re: preparing for nroff vrs html output?, groff, 2003/01/10
• Re: [Groff] UTP - fixed source tarball (and let's start indexing)], Jon Snader, 2003/01/10
  • Re: [Groff] UTP - fixed source tarball (and let's start indexing)], Larry Kollar, 2003/01/10
• [Groff] Stroustrup-style code typesetting?, Jorgen Grahn, 2003/01/10
• [Groff] UTP - fixed source tarball (and let's start indexing), Larry Kollar, 2003/01/09
• [Groff] URL macro arguments, W. Robert Daasch, 2003/01/09
  • Re: [Groff] URL macro arguments, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/22
• [Groff] Revised version of the proposed revised START macro for -mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/08
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Groff] Revised version of the proposed revised START macro for -mom, Peter Schaffter, 2003/01/11
• [Groff] Character spacing and spread, Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2003/01/07
  • Re: [Groff] Character spacing and spread, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/08
  • Re: [Groff] Character spacing and spread, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/08
• Re: [Groff] Rotating an epos figure, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/07
• [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/07
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, Peter Schaffter, 2003/01/08
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/08
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, Peter Schaffter, 2003/01/11
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/11
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/08
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, Peter Schaffter, 2003/01/11
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/11
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Groff] Proposed revised START macro for mom, Peter Schaffter, 2003/01/11
• [Groff] Images in groff - State of the Union, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/07
  • Re: [Groff] Images in groff - State of the Union, Robert D. Goulding, 2003/01/07
• [Groff] Playing with the postscript output, Thomas Baruchel, 2003/01/06
  • Re: [Groff] Playing with the postscript output, Larry Kollar, 2003/01/06
  • Re: [Groff] Playing with the postscript output, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2003/01/07
• [Groff] Is _M considered an internal register of -me?, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/06
• [Groff] More test cases for MM margin setting bugs, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/05
• [Groff] Definite bug in MM macros' margin handling, James J. Ramsey, 2003/01/05
• [Groff] Patch to include paper size in grops output, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/05
  • Re: [Groff] Patch to include paper size in grops output, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/05
  • Re: [Groff] Patch to include paper size in grops output, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/05
  • Re: [Groff] Patch to include paper size in grops output, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/06
• [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/04
  • Re: [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/04
    • Re: [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/04
    • Re: [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] numeric chars are broken, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/05
• Re: [Groff] tbl X keyletter, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/04
  • Re: [Groff] tbl X keyletter, Steven Starr, 2003/01/10
    • Re: [Groff] tbl X keyletter, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/22
• [Groff] ME 2c, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/02
  • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Christian Jensen, 2003/01/03
    • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/03
      • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Christian Jensen, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/04
  • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Patrik Schindler, 2003/01/03
  • Re: [Groff] ME 2c, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/03
• Re: [Groff] Text running off the top of the page. Is it a bug?, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/02
  • Re: [Groff] Text running off the top of the page. Is it a bug?, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/03
    • Re: [Groff] Text running off the top of the page. Is it a bug?, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] Text running off the top of the page. Is it a bug?, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] Text running off the top of the page. Is it a bug?, Egil Kvaleberg, 2003/01/04
• Re: [Groff] On the glyphs `~=' and `|=', Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/02
• Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control?, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/02
  • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Ken Deen, 2003/01/04
    • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Larry Jones, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Jack Dennon, 2003/01/06
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/04
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/06
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2003/01/08
      • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Werner LEMBERG, 2003/01/09
  • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Ken Deen, 2003/01/04
    • Re: [Groff] widow/orphan control, Ralph Corderoy, 2003/01/04
• Re: [Groff] MM - top and bottom, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/01
  • Re: [Groff] MM - top and bottom, Daniele Furlan, 2003/01/02
    • Re: [Groff] MM - top and bottom, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia, 2003/01/03

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc