[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?
From: |
Logi |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 00:47:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021203 |
> But what i do not understand is : Why, since new emule, my download
is always
> 2 to 4 times less than my upload. And that is what i saw generally in
the
> forum's stats. That is not compatible with my vision of the
peer-to-peer file
> sharing ! Most of the people use a DSL line, so what anybody download
comes
> from a DSL upload, that is to say about 16KB/s : that is why download
should
> be equal about to upload.
> Do you agree with this or not ?
Generally I agree with you. But low download rates need not be
necessarily the fault of Emule.
My download rates skyrocketet after 2.02 and so my low rates before were
due to a bug in MLDonkey.
Emule users do have to upload even more than others. With
MLDonkey/Edonkey you can set upload to 10 and then leech all the way. In
Emule the ratio is always 1:4 all the way up.
I myself have no problems downloading from Emules (see stats at end of
post) but if others experience difficulties I think the right way is to
analyse why and solve the problem.
Stupid banning does nothing but to give MLDonkey a bad name.
Uptime: 57800 seconds (0+16:03)
Total downloads: 571140499
eDonkey: 70732709 (12.38 %)
old mldonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
new mldonkey: 5519360 (0.97 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 494888430 (86.65 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total uploads: 4542009750
eDonkey: 1594159017 (35.10 %)
old mldonkey: 32090832 (0.71 %)
new mldonkey: 117895699 (2.60 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 2797864202 (61.60 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total banneds: 5
eDonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
old mldonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
new mldonkey: 1 (20.00 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 4 (80.00 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, (continued)
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Michael Panteleit, 2002/12/26
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Ultimateclem, 2002/12/26
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Klaus Imgrund, 2002/12/26
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Christian Klein, 2002/12/26
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Klaus Imgrund, 2002/12/26
Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Roland Arendes, 2002/12/26
Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?,
Logi <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] banning emule?, Sir Pingus, 2002/12/26
- [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Marc, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, gfdsa, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Michael Panteleit, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, gfdsa, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Tobias Neumann, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Michael Panteleit, 2002/12/27
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/27
Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Marc, 2002/12/27
Re: [Mldonkey-users] emule killed mldonkey.. that's a fact, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/27