[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?
From: |
Steven D'Aprano |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:23:12 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:26:33 am Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 03:39 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > even if you convert,
> > which most rabbis don't allow and even those who do make it very
> > difficult, you'll always be a Jew by conversion and not a "real"
> > Jew.
>
> In general, rabbis discourage conversion and make it hard because
> we're not a proselytizing religion, and being a properly observant
> Jew is not exactly easy. That being said, a convert is just as much
> a Jew as one who was born to it. In fact, their Hebrew name is
> ben/bas Abraham, son or daughter of Abraham, not to show they're a
> convert, but to tie them into our heritage. You, as a gentile may
> not consider them "real" Jews, but we do.
I hate to tell somebody they're wrong about their own religion... oh who
am I kidding, I love it! *wink*
Cohens are prohibited from marrying converts, making converts
second-class Jews:
http://judaism.about.com/od/jewishweddingsmarriage/f/cohen_convt.htm
"My mother converted to Judaism for the wrong intentions [...] I need to
know if I am really Jewish?"
http://judaism.about.com/library/3_askrabbi_o/bl_simmons_conversionreal.htm
And converts get a special name, different from everyone else, singling
them out as a group and making sure that in religious ritual everyone
knows that they're a convert.
Of course, as one of my Jewish friends says, if you gather three Rabbis
in a room together and ask them what the weather is like outside,
you'll get four different opinions. I have absolutely no doubt that you
will be able to find other authorities who disagree with the above, so
how about if we just say that treatment of converts varies?
--
Steven D'Aprano
- Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Steven D'Aprano, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/09
- [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/10
- [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Graham Todd, 2010/03/10
- [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?,
Steven D'Aprano <=
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/07
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Paul Crawford, 2010/03/08
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Leslie Newell, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Paul Crawford (at UoD), 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Leslie Newell, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/08
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Paul Crawford, 2010/03/08