[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU
From: |
Jeremy Petzold |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU |
Date: |
18 Jul 2001 05:32:13 -0700 |
I am certainly no Java expert(can't write in it...yet :) ) but I thought that
I herd of a clean room implementation of it already. can anyone verify that?
-Jeremy
On Wed, 18 July 2001, Martin Coxall wrote:
>
> > > Java is encumbered by Sun's licensing. It would be a *very* bad move to
> > > use it as the core of Arch.
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > May I be so bold to say: we don't need Mono.
>
> Fair enough. Design something new. CLEAN ROOM. Java is unclean. Encumbered.
> Proprietary. It would be immoral to use it and a fundamental betrayal of the
> principles of the Free Software movement. It would be a tremendous corruption
> of all that the GNU project stands for to even consider using Java.
>
> I only suggest Mono because it is the only other alternative we have at
> present. *Open* standard. Free, unencumbered.
>
> ---
> Martin
> ---
>
> "Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
Regards,
Jeremy
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, (continued)
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/16
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU,
Jeremy Petzold <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), David Sugar, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18