[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast
From: |
Russell Standish |
Subject: |
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:24:03 +1000 (EST) |
Gulyas Laszlo wrote:
> > 2) Has too many incompatible versions
>
> I don't understand this. I've been using Java since 1.0
> and never had incompatibility issues. Also, I've been
> using it on Solaris, Linux, Windows and OS X, but the
> largest incompatibility was about the size of screen fonts...
>
Lets just say that the last experience I had of Java about 2 years ago
on both Linux and Irix was not a happy one. By contrast, I've had
pretty smooth sailing with gcc. Its possibly a familiarity thing - I
always have disasterous experiences whenver I use a Windows platform too.
> > 3) Lacks operator overloading
>
> This is the religious kind of problem, I think. I never liked
> that in C++.
>
Why impose your religious preferences on others? For my line of work,
operator overloading is essential for readable code. It is for this
reason I never took to Objective C or Swarm. I'm hoping to rectify
this with a C++/Swarm interface, but keep you posted.
> > 4) Lacks generic programming
>
> True. But you'd probably need a rather large project to use that.
> As far as I remember, it wasn't 101 in Objective-C either.
>
Try Ecolab. Its quite a modest project at about 12,000 lines, but
generic programming is used to good effect. In fact, parts of it need
to be rewritten using GP, as they're a bugger to maintain as they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967, 8308 3119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965, 0425 253119 (")
Australia address@hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
International prefix +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: swarm support (was compare swarm with repast), (continued)
- Re: swarm support (was compare swarm with repast), Marcus G. Daniels, 2002/08/12
- Re: swarm support (was compare swarm with repast), Darren Schreiber, 2002/08/13
- Re: polymorphism (was compare swarm with repast), Gulyas Laszlo, 2002/08/12
- Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Gulyas Laszlo, 2002/08/12
- Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, gepr, 2002/08/12
- Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Marcus G. Daniels, 2002/08/12
- Re: Compare Swarm with Repast,
Russell Standish <=
- RE: Compare Swarm with Repast, gepr, 2002/08/11
- Kenge GIS-CA Toolkit?, Jan Peters, 2002/08/12
- Re: Kenge GIS-CA Toolkit?, Paul Johnson, 2002/08/14
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Jan Burse, 2002/08/11
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Jan Burse, 2002/08/11
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Gulyas Laszlo, 2002/08/12
RE: Compare Swarm with Repast, Marshall, James A R, 2002/08/12
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Gary Polhill, 2002/08/14
Re: Compare Swarm with Repast, Gary Polhill, 2002/08/16