Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono...

[Gopal.V]

If memory serves me right, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> No. Mono is just a runtime, a compiler and a set of class libraries.
        While DotGNU is not , so next time you think about comparing
the two -- forget it. 

        Also what I have quoted was from *your* mailing list, it is not
my creation. I don't have any responsibility about the content and
I had mentioned it in the parent thread. (Read the big print at the top
;)

Gopal.V
-- 
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
 //===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
 \\===<=>===//