Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono...

[Gopal.V]

If memory serves me right, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> I don't fancy flame wars, so I don't reply to random postings on the
        Unfortunately for most people -- arguments are something I enjoy.
(not flame wars -- and this is not a flame war)
> (mono needs ms sw while pnet doesn't) are false.
        Cscc has not used MS csc -- I know it for a fact. AFAIK, mcs 
has *used* MS csc . (can't change that fact, so no use arguing).
> I respect your ideas and opinions, 
        As I have said before "I give and take respect". So expect the 
same here.
> but you're not furthering the goals of free-software with lies; 
        Next time I'll verify before quoting something on the mono-list.
(did someone deny that post ?)
> you do it writing free software,
        Every line of the code I have ever written has been GPL'd.
(except my exams).
> spreading love for your friends. 
        That *IS* impossible, you don't know my friends, do you ? (ROTFLAMO ;).

Gopal.V

PS: In the course of discussion I have proved many points beyond argument .
Since I was not trying to prove anything against Mono || Lupus , I will
not relist them here.
-- 
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
 //===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
 \\===<=>===//